Friday, June 10, 2011

megan fox golden globes 2011

images Golden Globes 2011 Natalie megan fox golden globes 2011. Megan @ 2011 Golden Globe
  • Megan @ 2011 Golden Globe


  • vin13
    06-25 10:10 AM
    Colbert, Immigrant Farm Workers Challenge Pundits And Unemployed To 'Take Our Jobs' (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/24/colbert-immigrant-farm-wo_n_624875.html?ir=Politics)

    In a tongue-in-cheek call for immigration reform, farm workers are teaming up with comedian Stephen Colbert to challenge unemployed Americans: Come on, take our jobs.

    Farm workers are tired of being blamed by politicians and anti-immigrant activists for taking work that should go to Americans and dragging down the economy......

    So the group is encouraging the unemployed � and any Washington pundits or anti-immigrant activists who want to join them � to apply for the some of thousands of agricultural jobs being posted with state agencies as harvest season begins.

    All applicants need to do is fill out an online form under the banner "I want to be a farm worker" at , and experienced field hands will train them and connect them to farms. TAKEOURJOBS.ORG (http://www.takeourjobs.org)

    This is really a good one. It clears out some of the misconceptions among the general public.




    wallpaper Megan @ 2011 Golden Globe megan fox golden globes 2011. Golden Globes. Megan Fox
  • Golden Globes. Megan Fox


  • xbohdpukc
    04-02 10:06 AM
    You guys probably verified this already but -

    if you read (the intended) Sec 218D (amendment to the INA) and Sec 602 of S.2454, they do not exclude legal aliens.

    All that is required under 218D is that a person must have been in the US on or before Jan 7, 2004 and have proof of employment.

    Why shouldn't a legal nonimmigrant visa holder apply for AOS under 218D?

    What am I missing here?

    you are missing the whole point: you should've been undocumented on or before Jan 7th 2004




    megan fox golden globes 2011. Megan Fox Armani Prive dress
  • Megan Fox Armani Prive dress


  • asanghi
    02-26 02:48 PM
    No need for AP. If someone mails him the GC, he can get back to the U.S. with it.

    Please recheck your info before dispensing advice. Adjustment of Status application is based on premise that you are already present in USA. At the time approval, you should be present in USA. Thus the need for AP. If your Green card AOS application has been approved while you are out of country. You NEED AP to enter.




    2011 Golden Globes. Megan Fox megan fox golden globes 2011. megan fox 2011 golden globes
  • megan fox 2011 golden globes


  • allegator
    03-18 08:45 AM
    I need advice..My project ended yesterday and I have another opportunity to work on EAD. I know my current employer will not be able to find a job for me as has been the case earlier and he will remove me from payroll soon. Can I start working with new employer and do not resign from my current employer?

    I need help on this as I do not want to terminate my job from my side.

    Any advice will be appreciated.

    Thanks,



    more...

    megan fox golden globes 2011. Megan Fox#39;s 2011 Golden Globes
  • Megan Fox#39;s 2011 Golden Globes


  • jediknight
    09-16 02:05 PM
    It's time to tell CNN not to give a platform for racists.

    Drop Dobbs: Halt the Hate (http://www.dropdobbs.com/)

    Please sign the petition
    Take Action (http://www.dropdobbs.com/take-action/)

    "Drop Dobbs": CNN Pressured To Give Up Controversial Host (VIDEO) (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/16/drop-dobbs-cnn-pressured_n_288506.html)

    Please also post this to other web forums, facebook, twitter and send emails to your friends and colleagues asking them to sign the petition.

    - JK




    megan fox golden globes 2011. Megan Fox Golden Globes 2011 2
  • Megan Fox Golden Globes 2011 2


  • leoindiano
    07-09 01:08 PM
    Guys,
    Lot of our friends are waiting from 1998... Please wait, your turn will come.:o

    This is about I-140 and Premium Processing. In 1998, there was no premium processing. Looks like you have no idea. Where do you come from? are you a stealth user? are you betsy ross?



    more...

    megan fox golden globes 2011. WORST TATT: Megan Fox
  • WORST TATT: Megan Fox


  • franklin
    02-09 10:39 AM
    It will not help anyone being negative.




    2010 Megan Fox Armani Prive dress megan fox golden globes 2011. Golden Globes 2011 Natalie
  • Golden Globes 2011 Natalie


  • gc_in_30_yrs
    11-21 01:16 PM
    I saw the following status on I-131

    Application Type: I131, APPLICATION FOR USCIS TRAVEL DOCUMENT

    Current Status: Document mailed to applicant.

    On November 21, 2007 we mailed the document to the address we have on file. You should receive the new document within 30 days. If you do not, or if you move before you get it, call customer service.


    Does it mean that I-131 is approved?

    Yes, I guess.



    more...

    megan fox golden globes 2011. Megan Fox 2011 Golden Globes
  • Megan Fox 2011 Golden Globes


  • India_USA
    04-23 09:13 AM
    1) if quarterly soillover is a law and USCIS not doing it they are doing something against the law so we can file a lawsuit against it but again how can we prove that they are not doing quarterly spillover.
    USCIS says its happening......

    2) If USCIS doesnt use full numbers assigned for Green Cards and waste them you can again sue them for that but will it be succesfull or not that has to be researched.
    USCIS has not wasted visas in the past two years............

    3) That H1b employee - employer relation memo is a best example to file a lawsuit against them as there interpratation of the law was completely wrong but noone did it.
    I read somewhere about the memo being withdrawn for more review.............

    Finding a judge who will be favorable to our cause, priceless!!




    hair megan fox 2011 golden globes megan fox golden globes 2011. megan fox 2011 golden globes. megan fox 2011 golden globes
  • megan fox 2011 golden globes. megan fox 2011 golden globes


  • smuggymba
    09-22 07:35 PM
    Oh My God. These three won't stop, would they.



    more...

    megan fox golden globes 2011. Golden Globes 2011 Wallpapers
  • Golden Globes 2011 Wallpapers


  • suresh_la
    12-01 04:31 PM
    Hi Gurus

    Here is my senario

    I am in my 6th year of H1 which expires in Aug 2007.

    I have my Labor (PERM) and I140 aprroved from my current employer.

    I would like to tranfer my H1 to different employer .

    can we apply for tranfer and 3 year extension of h1 to new employer with approved current labor(PERM) and 140(approved)

    or should I need to tranfer my h1 forst and wait till FEB 2007 to apply my extension with approved labor(PERM) and 140 (approved ) from my current employer.

    I really need your advise on this issue.

    please help on this gurus.

    Thanks




    hot Megan Fox#39;s 2011 Golden Globes megan fox golden globes 2011. megan-fox-2011-golden-globes-3
  • megan-fox-2011-golden-globes-3


  • keerthi
    04-04 03:10 PM
    Thanks for that reply. The company's business line is very niche and it started developing a technology for that niche market in India some 5 years back. I have been involved in the design and implementation of that technology right from its inception. In fact I am one of the core persons who designed and implemented the solution.

    Our customer base is increasing in the US. This is one of the reasons why I need to be transferred to the US. Several of our customers are coming up with unique requirements and it requires me to analyze them before providing them a solution. Also, some features of the technology are governed by a large set of exacting standards put forth by a consortium in the US. I am one of the members of that consortium and my presence cum contribution for my company in this regard is very much required.

    I possess extensive knowledge of my company's specific technology and software skills which are very rare (we do low level software development - not the ones that large software companies do). Also, there are only a handful of companies who deal with this market. I believe this should ideally classify me as a person having "specialized knowledge".

    Am I right?



    more...

    house megan fox at the golden globe megan fox golden globes 2011. megan fox 2011 golden globes. Megan Fox — beautiful hair.
  • megan fox 2011 golden globes. Megan Fox — beautiful hair.


  • simple1
    02-15 11:37 AM
    I have the same query:

    Permit: using EAD and calling AC21
    Role: exactly the same.
    Salary: large difference (bayarea vs small city in under developed state) due to the prevailing wage at the new location is far lower.

    Experts please advice.




    tattoo Megan Fox Golden Globes 2011 2 megan fox golden globes 2011. Megan Fox 2011 Golden Globes
  • Megan Fox 2011 Golden Globes


  • aph0025
    11-12 10:36 AM
    Thanks a ton, edaltsis. Do you happen to know any good lawyer in and around Dallas? Or anywhere for that mater, who can handle this issue with ease? I did speak to a couple of them here, but I did not get a good feeling about my case from them.



    more...

    pictures WORST TATT: Megan Fox megan fox golden globes 2011. megan fox 2011 golden globes.
  • megan fox 2011 golden globes.


  • Pagal
    04-21 07:21 PM
    Hello,

    Welcome to Houston! There are many options for living ... though traditionally Indians have preferred Sugarland, other neighborhoods (e.g. Pearland, Katy) are nice as well ... my recommendation would be to rent an apartment in Riveroaks area first (very nice neighborhood) while you look around ...




    dresses megan-fox-2011-golden-globes-3 megan fox golden globes 2011. What would the Golden Globes
  • What would the Golden Globes


  • txh1b
    08-18 11:37 AM
    To be safe, once the h1b is approved, I would suggest that you travel and enter again so that you become eligible to use 245(k) rule if needed during your GC.

    If not, there is a risk for everything from the date you lost your job till your re-entry again to be considered as out of status/unlawful employment as per my lawyer.



    more...

    makeup Megan Fox 2011 Golden Globes megan fox golden globes 2011. megan fox at the golden globe
  • megan fox at the golden globe


  • raju123
    07-18 12:53 PM
    The Gandhi's philosophy indicates the peaceful protest against obvious injustice. The USCIS/DOS decision to stop accepting I 485 from July 2 was the obvious injustice due to couple of reasons; First, it is un precedent and legally not right to stop accepting I 485 when they made big weekend rush to use all visa. Second, No one can suddenly on and off as thousands of people preparing stuff in advance based on the visa bulletin.

    We can not use Gandhigiri for increasing visa number or expediting their immigration process. We can only request. it is not our right hence sending flower to PERM agency is not a good idea. Brahmastra (ultimate weapon) can be used at appropriate time only!




    girlfriend Megan Fox 2011 Golden Globes megan fox golden globes 2011. megan fox 2011 golden globes. megan fox 2011 golden globes
  • megan fox 2011 golden globes. megan fox 2011 golden globes


  • buehler
    01-31 12:04 PM
    If you get married before your GC is approved you're fine. You have something like 6 months grace period after your GC is aprroved to file for her I-485. It is better to keep all of her records ready so that you can file as soon as your PD becomes current.




    hairstyles Golden Globes 2011 Wallpapers megan fox golden globes 2011. Golden Globes 2011 Natalie
  • Golden Globes 2011 Natalie


  • reddog
    01-31 12:31 AM
    YOu will have to wait till your PD gets current.




    Brittanicus
    04-22 08:38 PM
    First and foremost we are a nation of laws, or as we are all anticipated? But years of previous administrations have neglected the illegal immigrant problem, to the detriment of American workers. Ever since the inception of the 1986 Immigration & Reform Act, signed into law by Ronald Reagan, the politicians have pushed for a new AMNESTY. In addition, anytime a new law has been drafted to combat the illegal immigrant occupation of our country, they have behind closed doors killed it or weakened it's enactment. The law of given instant citizenship to babies intentionally born here, is a complete misinterpretation of the 14th amendment, after the civil war that emancipated African slaves.

    It was never meant for (Anchor Babies) to give pregnant illegal alien mothers the right to legal status? The law has been badly mauled because the children can then draw on US education, free medical care, free baby delivery and after care, low income housing and it is a route to many government handouts. The major problem now facing the Obama White House is are the children of illegal immigrants to blame for their parents breaking the law? Obviously the left-wingers are to blame for this conundrum, but both parties have added to neglect to the sovereign laws of our nation. I think we should follow other countries "Rule of Law" and cement in place that children who have proven themselves can go to a place of higher learning. We desperately need a wide scope of professionals in Engineering, Science and 21st Century technology. But also remember that our government settles the largest population of new immigrants on Earth. What we don't need is more poorly educated, non-English speaking, impoverished aliens, looking for handouts. Like other developed nations we must be very specific, who we pick and choose as new citizens. We must also restrain ourselves from chain migration, who are liable to become a public charges, because the family sponsors have decided the US taxpayer should carry the financial weight?

    We can thank our corrupt liberal politicians, judges in the past as drafting a passive law, instead of entering America being a criminal offense. Now we have uncountable number of illegal aliens squatting here, because of the absolute intentional neglect of our lawmakers. Is there any other country in the world, that makes illegally crossing into their sovereign territory a Civil Crime--I really don't think so? Our laws deliberately drafted this way in favor of the open border, big Catholic church and special interest groups. To HXXX with the American people, who are forced to fight for their jobs?

    But if American defeat the next Amnesty ready to pounce on the unsuspecting legal population, we must make an example in using the 1986 law. We as a people must build-on the E-Verify application, upgrade, modify to extract illegal job applicants from the workplace. Illegal immigrants who have overstayed visas, illegal crossed the border and children must be exempt from any pardon. All children of illegal parents that have committed crimes, been expelled or just deserted school should leave with parents in the usage of self-deportation. This is a compliance way to remove foreign nationals and any criminal businesses that employ them, must receive mandatory, fines, asset confiscation and prison terms. The use of a in-perpetuity E-Verify will be a ultimate deterrent and see movement of illegal labor and families packing and leaving under the term of "ATTRITION" We must force our reluctant politicians to be governed by--THE PEOPLE'S--WILL or face the dire consequences in the election process. This will surely happen when Sen. Reid, Speaker Pelosi and 48 other Senate lawmakers come up for re-election. They underfunded E-Verify, that obviously is working efficiently for them to kill it. Today I have heard Homeland Security Chief Janet Napolitano is approaching State governors to appeal the Real ID Act, that would add national standards for state-issued driver licenses and non-driver identification cards, Revising and tightening the laws on application for asylum and deportation of aliens for terrorist activity. That wouldWaiver laws that interfere with construction of physical barriers at the borders, to name a few statutes. So that means since the new Presidency, the Democratic run Congress are trying to revoke E-Verify and the Real ID act. My guess, is under this regime they will be rescinding the Federal program for State and local police called 247(g) that trains officers to arrest and detain illegal alien criminals.

    The open border, free traders, special interest groups will use any contradictions, epithets, racial slurs to annul any new law--which they have done successfully up to now. But American should realize strongly, that this has nothing to do with a persons color, religion or ethnic background--and EVERYTHING--to do with being--CARTE BLANCHE--for parasite employers, who pay nothing to illegal immigrant upkeep? It's left to Taxpayers? Its everything to do with billions of dollars spent, to pacify the big Catholic church, a portion of Liberal voters and others who see nothing wrong in loading citizens, residents down with sky high taxes. Supposedly the last White House promised no thoughts of a Path to Citizenship until the border was orderly and closed to undesirable With another drafted and secret Amnesty on the House and Senate table, like always--this is not the case. Drug smuggling and incessant illegal immigration is still very prevalent. The rumors from the new White House are clearly signaling another push for AMNESTY?

    So go to these sites: VDARE, FAIRUS, JUDICIALWATCH, NUMBERSUSA, AMERICANPATROL, CAPSWEB & ALIPAC. The stakes are sky high because Amnesty means, thousands more will swamp the border looking for yet a 3rd---AMNESTY.




    waitnwatch
    06-01 04:54 PM
    Just a thought. If wishes were horses......

    While the poll can only show what we would want if we had our way, I would request our members to step back give it a thought and be a bit realistic. Did we not have only legal immigration issues in the bill last December. Why do you then hope that the house would suddenly change their mind and provide us a superfast ride to a green card.

    A poll like this one would show the similar lopsided numbers like say what Lou Dobbs gets on his polls. Reason is - mostly people who want a more reasonable wait time for permanent residence subscribe to this forum.

    I myself would vote to have a bill separately for us. But does that do us any good. Think about this. The current bill has good provisions for legal immigrants. Which of the two options would you choose.

    (a) Would you want to oppose and kill this legislation because it provides undocumented workers with an opportunity to become legal and thereby cut your nose to spite your face.
    (b) Would you first see the current bill to the end and then consider other options only if it dies.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment